“Information wants to be free.” – Stewart Brand
Information is a one way street running downhill towards freedom. Copies of information proliferate like vermin; every last copy must be destroyed to successfully eradicate it. Secrets are made to be leaked, or, in the parlance of our times, some things you can’t unsee.
Once free, information becomes a lego block, a component that’s available for construction. Charles Babbage couldn’t have built the differencing engine, his totally steampunk mechanical computer, without the development of standard screw sizes during the industrial revolution. Standardization was itself information, that once disseminated, others could incorporate into their ideas and build upon.
Sometimes the problem of information freedom lies more with retrieval than generation. There’s a common tale in mathematics where a frustrated researcher will find the answer to their problem already solved in the yellowed pages of a journal; a curious and novel idea that died before its time, lacking a problem to apply itself against.
We swim through an ocean of information every second, dragging behind us a net full of flotsam. Occasionally we come across a bit of wire that lets us tie two useless pieces of junk together, and suddenly they transform into something magically new. And what is our first instinct with this magical new thing? Do we hoard it like gold, safe from the prying eyes of the world? No, we fight to shout it from the rooftops! The proverbial butterfly of information touches off a million million-touching children, and a ripple of novelty spreads through the noosphere.
Someone else drifts past and puts a copy in their net. Maybe someday they’ll combine it to release their own butterfly. Extrapolating information’s desire for freedom to its inevitably conclusion, we derive its expansionist corollary:
Information wants to be built upon.